It’s the “liberty” to do any damned fool thing that they felt like doing regardless of consequence. Sounds just like today’s liberal democrats, doesn’t it?
Yes, it does. And, from a strategic or tactical standpoint, it just doesn’t make much sense. That’s why I am convinced that the real purpose of these advocates is not to advance liberty. So, what is the motivation? Why would somebody want to associate himself with slavery in order to promote liberty?
Does the Vulcan mind meld work across a century and a half?