Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TBP
Lincoln said if he could "preserve the Union" without freeing a single slave, he would do so.

He also said that if he could "preserve the Union" by freeing all the slaves, he would do so.

44 posted on 11/03/2015 1:21:07 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg
He also said that if he could "preserve the Union" by freeing all the slaves, he would do so.

Which is irrelevant to the point that Lincoln was not fighting a war to end slavery, but was instead fighting a war to end independence from Washington D.C.

52 posted on 11/03/2015 1:58:41 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

IOW, it wasn’t ever about freeing the slaves. Whether they got freed or not was inconsequential. What it was about was preserving the Union (by force.) If the slaves stayed slaves, OK. If they all got freed, OK. Whatever served the interest of preserving and expanding the power of DC.

All in the name of liberty, of course.


84 posted on 11/03/2015 10:20:19 PM PST by TBP (with the wrong hand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson