Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/30/2015 4:47:08 AM PDT by IBD editorial writer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: IBD editorial writer

And once hackers get a hold of them?


2 posted on 10/30/2015 4:47:50 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Idiots. Of course they will until they are perfected. The cars of yesteryears were death traps and now they are pretty darn safe for the most part. These authors are so dumb.


3 posted on 10/30/2015 4:51:40 AM PDT by napscoordinator (Walker for President 2016. The only candidate with actual real RESULTS!!!!! The rest...talkers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

So are fatherless kids.


5 posted on 10/30/2015 4:53:03 AM PDT by YourAdHere (I just took a huge Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

A driverless car can’t be worse than 1/2 the morons out there.


6 posted on 10/30/2015 4:53:10 AM PDT by petercooper (And I was born in the back seat of a Greyhound bus... Rollin' down Highway 41.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Another short excerpt from F.R.’s resident I.B.D. pimp. Don’t bother to ask him a question, he won’t answer, he’s strictly post and run. Gotta get those hits ya know.


7 posted on 10/30/2015 4:53:19 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Bill and Hillary Clinton are the penicillin-resistant syphilis of our political system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer
As a result, they can't rule out "the possibility that the actual rates for self-driving vehicles are lower than for conventional vehicles." They also note that the severity of the crashes that involved driverless cars tended to be lower. The biggest difference that the research found, however, is fault. So far, driverless cars were to blame for zero of the crashes.

As usual, a misleading headline. So very typical of today's prostitute media.

8 posted on 10/30/2015 4:55:27 AM PDT by Flick Lives (One should not attend even the end of the world without a good breakfast. -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Over-reliance on technology has already created the world’s worst drivers.


10 posted on 10/30/2015 4:56:09 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Pride goes before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Is that supposed to be “unexpected”?


11 posted on 10/30/2015 4:56:16 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

>> But can people trust computer algorithms to guide them safely through incredibly complex and ever-changing road conditions?

Aw HAIL no you can’t trust computer algorithms in this kind of task!

By the way, I’m a programmer. I KNOW. :-)


12 posted on 10/30/2015 4:57:58 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (There is no "allah" but satan, and mohammed was his demon-possessed tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

I do not understand this BS fascination with driverless vehicles. If you don’t want to drive, take the bus.


14 posted on 10/30/2015 5:00:34 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

I love computers! I worked in IT for 30 years. Computers have automated so incredible tasks, supported by millions of lines of code and teams of IT people. Trust it with my life to drive my car? Ah, no.

Give me more advanced information - sure. I could use some infrared / night vision technology. Give me the sensor data of distances and vehicle locations.

But again, trust a computer with my life - never.


22 posted on 10/30/2015 5:14:53 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer
The hardware, algorithms and reliability will improve with time.
One day computer drivers will be safer than humans (which is good) but one day humans will not be allowed to drive without computer assist (which is not so good).

Computers have two advantages over humans, they don't get impatient or angry.
They have no reason to exceed the speed limit.
That may drive others crazy of course. Oh well.

23 posted on 10/30/2015 5:17:50 AM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer
I don't mind the "eyesight" features that allow vehicles to keep you from ramming another car or object, but I prefer the way my Mercedes works - any input from the driver to indicate he has control (steering/braking/taking foot off accelerator) results in the system not taking over.

The blind spot monitoring is also very nice as it only gives visual and audio signals vs. taking action.

The "leaving the lane" function is about useless.

Traction control can be useful under the right conditions but should require user action to turn it on vs. being always on unless the user turns it off.

I hate having "turn the engine off at a stop" function and the fact that it has to be manually turned off after each start - at least the button is readily accessible and it is punched every time I start up.

I also hate the "stability control" which can hit an individual tire's brake to get you out of some problems - if it kicks in while one is going over gravel/sand etc., and or on the brink of a drop off (that the car is blissfully unaware of) it can lead to disaster by screwing the pooch with a driver's attempts to maintain control under a dicey condition - only way to turn mine off is to enter the menu available from the steering wheel and disable the ESP option - it automatically enables at the next start.

Under specific conditions, some of the "enhancements" can be very useful, but under the wrong conditions, they can cause more harm than good.

24 posted on 10/30/2015 5:19:37 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Presumably, driverless cars will be designed so they automatically stop for pedestrians in their path.

Most cities I’ve been, pedestrians already walk out in front of traffic. The only thing that stops them is the chance that a driver may not see them and plow into them.

My prediction - once driverless cars are ubiquitous, pedestrians won’t even bother looking at traffic. They’ll just walk out into traffic anywhere that’s convenient knowing that all the cars will stop.

Then all the police formerly used to control drivers can be reallocated as jaywalking stormtroopers...


25 posted on 10/30/2015 5:24:06 AM PDT by chrisser (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer
Driverless Cars Far More Likely To Get Into Crashes, Study Finds

My theory is this: As long as there is a mix of driverless and non-driverless vehicles on the road, there will be crashes. Driverless vehicles can only be programmed for logical circumstances and they expect sane, logical actions by other drivers. Anyone who has been on the road for five minutes knows that sanity and logic are two very rare commodities, especially in traffic.

28 posted on 10/30/2015 5:27:53 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Charter Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy and Lifelong Enemy of Hillary Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer
The problem is that a driverless car can't see the driver next to it drop their coffee in their lap, the tire blow, the crap blowing in front of a nearby vehicle on a windy day, the strap that just broke on that semi loaded with drill pipe, the cuuute little bunny that will make the other driver swerve in 3..2...1...

There are more situations on the highway than can be programmed for, and things which happen in adjacent areas which affect what happens on the highway, so an attentive human can react before the situation becomes critical. Without true AI in the cars, they won't be able to do as well as a good human.

29 posted on 10/30/2015 5:29:25 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Well I guess that puts a fork in personal vehicles, get in your city run people movers and leave the driving to professionals. < /sarc >


34 posted on 10/30/2015 5:35:14 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Will Hillary's testimony on Benghazi be under oath? Baseball players were tried for perjury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

All I can think to say to that headline: Ya think?


37 posted on 10/30/2015 5:37:29 AM PDT by basil ( God bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Really? And how much did we, the American taxpayers, pay for that study...? I would’ve told you that for a cup of coffee.


40 posted on 10/30/2015 5:42:27 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IBD editorial writer

Just wait till they get hacked.
I know a network security guy who only buys and drives older cars. His reason? The ease of hacking into the computer.


41 posted on 10/30/2015 5:44:37 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson