Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray54

Yeah I see it didn’t hit glove. But if a fielder goes for an in-reach ball and it hits his body near his glove, it should be an error.

Actually I’m just sick of hearing about Escobar’s great-feat-that-was-a-flyout, and Harvey getting an earned run, when Cespedes flat-out bungled it.


49 posted on 10/28/2015 4:40:53 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: ReaganGeneration2

I’m not sure how they determine what is and what isn’t. I’ve seen plays before that I didn’t think were errors, and they were, and vice versa. I guess it is what it is.


50 posted on 10/28/2015 4:48:32 AM PDT by Ray54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: ReaganGeneration2; Ray54
Yeah I see it didn’t hit glove. But if a fielder goes for an in-reach ball and it hits his body near his glove, it should be an error.

You are correct that the ball doesn't have to touch the glove to be an error. Otherwise, when an infielder lifts up too early on an easy ground ball which rolls between the infielder's legs but doesn't touch the glove would have to be ruled a hit. The standard is whether the ball should have been caught with reasonable effort. In my opinion, Cespedes' play was clearly an error. Lorenzo Cain would have made that look like a deep but routine fly ball.

I'm glad it happened though. Go Royals.

52 posted on 10/28/2015 7:18:55 AM PDT by CommerceComet (Ignore the GOP-e. Cruz to victory in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson