Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Not More US Attacks?
self

Posted on 10/15/2015 11:32:05 AM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Considering what we all know has happened to the US posture towards terrorism under the current regime, the question becomes why haven’t there been more larger and organized attacks in the US the past couple of years?

I have my theories but I was wondering what my fellow FREEPERS thought about the topic.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: usattacks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

They’re too busy fighting each other to worry about Obama’s third world US


21 posted on 10/15/2015 12:43:12 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

Why bother attacking us when our president is doing more damage to the country, in less time, than any terrorist group could dream of doing?


22 posted on 10/15/2015 1:05:22 PM PDT by WayneS (Yeah, it's probably sarcasm...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton

These people are not stupid. Ask them if Obama is a Muslim and they will confidently say yes. Ask them how they know ant they’ll tell you that Michelle accompanied Barak to every country he visited except the two that have Sharia law. A Muslim man can not bring a non-Muslim wife to those countries.

They know they have the best ally ever in the White House now. They will put their people in place and wait for him to be out of the White House before they attempt anything major. They have no intention of embarrassing him or stopping the legal, White House sanctioned, immigration of more fighters to US shores.


23 posted on 10/15/2015 1:20:30 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr
You are correct. I would add that US immigration policy and border enforcement are allowing them to infiltrate. If they were to attack too soon, even 0bama would be forced to respond. With no attacks, they are allowed to continue the slow take over.
24 posted on 10/15/2015 1:26:12 PM PDT by Alright2BRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I hear you, but that doesn’t answer the question of why they aren’t attacking now.

Why attack today when BO (and company) will make us even weaker tomorrow, and the day after that? Meanwhile, the bad guys get stronger and continue to plan better.

They can wait for the election and see which direction we’re going. Maybe we’d continue downward under another ‘rat president for 4 more years. But, if we elect some hawk, they can pull the trigger. Yes, just like 2001 after 8 years of Clinton gutting the armed forces.

Yes, the next admin would be pissed, but depending on who launches the attack (Russians, Chinese, Iran, NKorea, AQ) and how devastating it is, it’d be worth the extra time planning and prepping to get in that first big one. And they’ll have more information this time next year. No need to show their hand earlier than necessary.

That’s just how I think. Thanks for the thoughtful response.


25 posted on 10/15/2015 7:59:44 PM PDT by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson