Skip to comments.
Report: Playboy Will No Longer Publish Nude Photos (Yes, you read that right)
NBC News ^
| Oct 13, 2015
| Reuters News Service
Posted on 10/12/2015 9:36:18 PM PDT by dayglored
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: dayglored
This proves that anything can reach a point of being overexposed. Your tolerance level is ratched up way too high.
Just call this the Neo-Roaring 20s.
To: dayglored
He needs to do a sex pose with his shrived up penis.
22
posted on
10/12/2015 9:56:00 PM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: dayglored
I guess this means Staple Placement will no longer be an issue for Playboy “readers”.
23
posted on
10/12/2015 9:56:03 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
To: onyx
Remember, a few years ago Hefner admitted that he watches gay pornography movies with his “girlfriends.”
To: moehoward; dayglored
I always bought it for the articles.Sure...
I always enjoyed the illustrations by Vargas!
25
posted on
10/12/2015 9:57:22 PM PDT
by
WVKayaker
(On Scale of 1 to 5 Palins, How Likely Is Media Assault on Each GOP Candidate?)
To: MNDude
>
...they once tried to make a magazine for married men— it had the same woman in it every month! Now THAT's funny, I don't care who you are!
26
posted on
10/12/2015 9:58:23 PM PDT
by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: dayglored
So America has become too decadent even for Playboy.
What a sad commentary on our society.
To: WVKayaker
>
... illustrations by Vargas! The absolute pinnacle. His drawings set a standard that will remain for many decades to come. The stuff of dreams.
28
posted on
10/12/2015 9:59:54 PM PDT
by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: o-n-money
Say’s it in the article-down to 800thou.My daughter’s best friend was a centerfold.Bought the issue.Not that impressed.She dated a football player after that-the centerfold.He hung around with my daughter’s crowd till he was transferred.
29
posted on
10/12/2015 10:02:24 PM PDT
by
fatima
(Free Hugs Today :))
To: moehoward; dayglored
I always bought it for the articles.Sure...
... and the cartoons!
30
posted on
10/12/2015 10:03:28 PM PDT
by
WVKayaker
(On Scale of 1 to 5 Palins, How Likely Is Media Assault on Each GOP Candidate?)
To: dayglored
“Playbody without a centerfold is like... like... like... I don’t know. What’s it like???”
Like MAD Magazine without a fold-in back cover?
31
posted on
10/12/2015 10:07:06 PM PDT
by
howlinhound
(Live your life so that, when you get up in the morning, Satan says, "Oh Crap!..He's awake" - Unknown)
To: Kickass Conservative
>
Maybe it’s just me, but there is a difference between NUDE and COMPLETELY NUDE. Eh, I'm not so sure.
Nude these days means (in the case of a woman) that her nipples and crotch are showing with no significant covering.
Breast skin (other than nipples) is not considered "nude". Butts are not considered nude, they even show up on FR.
Is a woman who is completely dressed except that her nipples and crotch are visible considered nude?
The terms become very ambiguous when you dive into the details.
32
posted on
10/12/2015 10:07:29 PM PDT
by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: howlinhound
>
Like MAD Magazine without a fold-in back cover? Wow, there's a blast from the past...
33
posted on
10/12/2015 10:09:54 PM PDT
by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: moehoward
“I always bought it for the articles.”
Then you should be deliriously happy now because zero nude pics leaves even MORE room for “articles”.
34
posted on
10/12/2015 10:11:29 PM PDT
by
catnipman
(Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
To: Kickass Conservative
>
I guess this means Staple Placement will no longer be an issue for Playboy “readers”. Those staples, so cruelly placed in young women's navels by uncaring publishers, were the clearest indication of Playboy's War on Women.
35
posted on
10/12/2015 10:12:15 PM PDT
by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: dayglored
so, pics of naked men then?
36
posted on
10/12/2015 10:13:47 PM PDT
by
bigbob
To: dfwgator
Na na nananana nananana nanananana...
37
posted on
10/12/2015 10:20:50 PM PDT
by
uglybiker
(nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
To: bigbob
>
so, pics of naked men then? That's been done, too.
I read somewhere (and it was mentioned in comment #24) that Hef took to watching gay pr0n in recent years. So I guess ya never know...
38
posted on
10/12/2015 10:21:33 PM PDT
by
dayglored
("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
To: moehoward
> I always bought it for the articles.
I remember the Madonna centerfoldback in the '80's. Boy was that disappointing. I remember thinking her armpits were hairier than mine and she had no boobs (to speak of). What was I thinking?
To: dayglored
All I know is, I know it when I see it. LOL
At my age, I can’t get lost in the details.
40
posted on
10/12/2015 10:22:21 PM PDT
by
Kickass Conservative
(THEY LIVE, and we're the only ones wearing the Sunglasses.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson