Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Test Facility Begins Capturing Carbon from Air: Demonstration of industrial scale carbon capture
Technology Review ^ | 10/11/2015 | By Richard Martin

Posted on 10/11/2015 6:49:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Sacajaweau

And guess where they will get it?


21 posted on 10/11/2015 7:23:36 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

Beat me to it!

CC


22 posted on 10/11/2015 7:24:34 PM PDT by Celtic Conservative (Lightspeed: 186,000 miles per second. It's not just a good idea, it's THE LAW!* *= ecomcon proofread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

So, we can put a black box on our car’s tailpipe, run the fuel that comes out of it to the fuel tank (after we put a solar panel on the roof), and drive forever.

These guys must have skipped physics class when thermodynamics and friction were discussed.

Next they will discover if you hook a generator to an electric motor, you have a perpetual motion machine.


23 posted on 10/11/2015 7:30:34 PM PDT by alpo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hmmmmm ..?? What are the trees and plants going to do when their main life force (CO2) is removed from the air ..????

And .. what are humans going to do when the trees do not have enough CO2 (carbon dioxide) .. in order to produce Oxygen for humans to breathe ..??????????

Guess all those genius scientists have not figured that out yet .. Hmmmmm ..???????????????

What needs to be removed is CARBON MONOXIDE (FROM CARBON FUELS) .. NOT DIOXIDE (which is what we exhale).

NOW .. does anybody understand why the “scientists” keep insisting it’s the humans who are causing all the problems .. and they have to find a way to punish us for BREATHEING.


24 posted on 10/11/2015 7:36:57 PM PDT by CyberAnt ("The fields are white unto Harvest")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trees are cheaper.


25 posted on 10/11/2015 7:46:46 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The full system is relatively energy-intensive”

Reading the process description, this is an energy pig. They should burn cheap natural gas to provide the power :)


26 posted on 10/11/2015 8:18:48 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown (http://www.futurnamics.com/reid.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'd like to know the amount of carbon emitted during the mining and transportation of the raw materials, as well as the smelting and fabrication of the component materials, along with the manufacturing and transportation of the finished product into installation. Those figures should include the transportation costs for employees and the electricity costs to operate any support contractors and government inspectors.

Maybe we can get a final estimate on when this carbon capture device will have recovered enough carbon to account for its own existence on day one of its life. That way, we'll have a good idea of the anticipated utility of the project.

27 posted on 10/11/2015 9:14:02 PM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (If a border fence isn't effective, why is there a border fence around the White House?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Museum quality dumb


28 posted on 10/11/2015 9:20:31 PM PDT by TexasTransplant (Idiocracy used to just be a Movie... Live every day as your last...one day you will be right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A solution in search of a problem.


29 posted on 10/11/2015 9:29:37 PM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The full system is relatively energy-intensive, which means that cheap, low-carbon power generation, most likely from solar power, will eventually be needed to make the energy economics work.”

In that case, why not just connect the solar power directly to the grid and use if for charging electric vehicles directly, and skip the nonsense of wasting all of that solar power on carbon recycling?


30 posted on 10/11/2015 9:51:21 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alpo

Whaddaya mean losses? All system losses are made up for by a huge influx of taxpayer funded grants.


31 posted on 10/12/2015 1:18:39 AM PDT by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How many kilowatts does that thing require, and what is the net carbon capture? How long before gaseous carbon dioxide sublimates from the liquid suspension? Questions a non-college indoctrinated person might ask.


32 posted on 10/12/2015 5:28:31 AM PDT by VTenigma (The Democratic party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson