Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australian Scientist Discover ERRORS in Global Warming Model - Completely Undermines Climate Theory!
The Right Scoop ^ | 10/08/2015 | soopermexican

Posted on 10/08/2015 6:58:04 AM PDT by conservativejoy

An Australian scientist has made some discoveries that will completely undermine the models that the Global Warming theory depends on.

From Perth Now:

A MATHEMATICAL discovery by Perth-based electrical engineer Dr David Evans may change everything about the climate debate, on the eve of the UN climate change conference in Paris next month.

A former climate modeller for the Government’s Australian Greenhouse Office, with six degrees in applied mathematics, Dr Evans has unpacked the architecture of the basic climate model which underpins all climate science.

He has found that, while the underlying physics of the model is correct, it had been applied incorrectly.

He has fixed two errors and the new corrected model finds the climate’s sensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO2) is much lower than was thought.

It turns out the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has over-estimated future global warming by as much as 10 times, he says.

“Yes, CO2 has an effect, but it’s about a fifth or tenth of what the IPCC says it is. CO2 is not driving the climate; it caused less than 20 per cent of the global warming in the last few decades”.

Now what this means is that all the whining about the apocalypse coming that will kill everyone is just a big hoax and exaggeration.

But it won’t matter, because it won’t be reported. As we saw earlier this week, when Ted Cruz pointed out a very important fact that undermined Global Warming models to the president of the Sierra Club, he didn’t even know that it existed!!

And you can bet that Obama will stay on track to destroy the ingenuity of American industry for the sake of a discredited hoax…


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: conservativejoy

This scientist has tried to make this case before...in 2011.

http://business.financialpost.com/fp-comment/climate-models-go-cold


21 posted on 10/08/2015 7:52:58 AM PDT by stylin19a (obama = Fredo Smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

Obama, Single Handidly, has done more Damage to the World in the last 7.5 Years than Global warming could in millions of years. Get rid of Obama First.


22 posted on 10/08/2015 7:53:22 AM PDT by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

it had been applied incorrectly

And it was intentional


23 posted on 10/08/2015 7:58:35 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Thanks!


24 posted on 10/08/2015 7:59:25 AM PDT by Techster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

I read somewhere a long time ago that warming came before a change in CO2 levels,not after.


25 posted on 10/08/2015 8:01:18 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

Climate Change fraud bump for later...


26 posted on 10/08/2015 8:04:05 AM PDT by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

97percent of climate scientists are clueless


27 posted on 10/08/2015 9:22:10 AM PDT by ully2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

97% of what scientists, climate siencetist has to be a pretty small group overall.


28 posted on 10/08/2015 9:48:54 AM PDT by Foolsgold (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Foolsgold

97% of “climate scientists” likely depend upon government grants and will say whatever the State wants them to say.


29 posted on 10/08/2015 10:01:40 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

No surprise. The fact that the actual models failed to predict the last 18 years is enough to know the math is wrong.


30 posted on 10/08/2015 10:53:23 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
97% of climate scientists (who were asked) (who offered an opinion in written reports) say there is no debate.
31 posted on 10/08/2015 10:56:33 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

This guy may not live long...


32 posted on 10/08/2015 11:09:31 AM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Yes, 97 percent of 75 people in the survey in which like 3 to 4 THOUSAND were originally polled and almost all were “filtered out”.... sigh.


33 posted on 10/09/2015 12:14:19 PM PDT by wpbgent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: conservativejoy

This so-called “scientist” once bought petrol at a station owned by “BIG OIL!” and remains in their pocket ever since.


34 posted on 10/09/2015 12:15:59 PM PDT by dead ("I'm up to my eyeball in virgin goats!" - Mullah Omar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson