Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
I have always thought that the "fossil fuel" theory was ridiculous. All of that material so deep in the ground could not be dinosaur goo. The abiotic theories make much more sense.

Biotic or Abiotic?

9 posted on 09/30/2015 9:04:54 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GingisK

It is hard to attribute those methane lakes on Titan and the hydrocarbon rich atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn on dinosaur remains.


16 posted on 09/30/2015 9:29:14 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: GingisK

Well, the “fossil fuel” theory was never really about “dinosaur goo”, that’s just a popular myth, probably stemming from poorly written books for kids.

Under the theory, coal is supposed to originate from vegetation that got buried on land. Oil and tar, on the other hand, are supposed to originate from simple organisms like plankton buried under the sea floor.


24 posted on 09/30/2015 9:47:16 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: GingisK

Great link!

The conflict between biotic vs abiotic origins of petroleum is fascinating.

I work a lot in oil and gas, and the topic in and of itself infuriates some folks.

Synolsis: only conspiracy theory types support the abiotic theory. You know, Ron Paul types.


29 posted on 09/30/2015 10:22:14 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (The economic collapse is imminent. Buy staple food and OTC meds now, before prices skyrocket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson