To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
And the serial killer wore OJ's shoes, left OJ's blood on the left side of the crime scene shoe prints which just happen to coincide with OJ having a cut on his left hand, he was seen driving OJ's Bronco from the crime scene, he left Niclole's blood on the driver's side door panel of OJ's Bronco, he left OJ's bloody glove in the rear of his home, he was seen by the limo driver hurrying into OJ's home and he left Nicole's and Goldman;s blood on OJ's socks.
Sorry, I'm not buying it.
16 posted on
09/25/2015 7:29:13 PM PDT by
South40
(Trump on Kim Davis: I hate to see her being sent to jail but the law is the law)
To: South40
Good, concise summation South. (Evidently we still have some folks around that are as damn dumb as that Simpson jury huh?)
25 posted on
09/25/2015 8:10:57 PM PDT by
bobby.223
(Retired up in the snowy mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a great life!)
To: South40
While OJ was clearly guilty based on a mountain of evidence, I’m not sure that that it was completely ruled out that there could also have been a little police misconduct with the evidence. For instance it certainly was lucky for the police that OJ dropped one glove at the murder scene and another at his house, Maybe OJ was dumb and/or clumsy enough to do this, but the police at least had an opportunity to arrange things this way as well.
To: South40
Yea but Mark Furhman said the “N” word to another cop back in the 80’s. So ... Innocent!
66 posted on
09/26/2015 4:56:02 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson