Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
I have been pounding the word "Original" for the last several years, and Cpn Hook seems to think he alone has just now thought of it.

Now? No, no, oh dim-witted one, I was pointing out on this Forum that Hawaii had used the term "original" in relationship to the birth certificate on file no later than 2004.

No, we've been looking for the word "Original" to appear in anything from Hawaii, and the word never seems to appear.

For someone who so loves to posture how extensively he's done the research and immersed himself in these topics (pointing out for a much longer time here than I have), you are consistently clueless. Here, you can read Dr. Onaka's words yourself:

Now, this document only has 5 sentences. Hint: one of them contains the words "the original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II on file with the State Department of Health."

Let's see this time if you can find it.

278 posted on 10/01/2015 2:39:48 PM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]


To: CpnHook

Make the date above “no later than 2014.”


279 posted on 10/01/2015 2:46:17 PM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

To: CpnHook
Dense little child, it says

The original Certificate of LIve Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, is on file with the State of Hawaii Department of Health."

For those of us who speak English, that simply means they have his original document. It does *NOT* say that we have seen his original document.

Ignorant little crapweasel, the word "original" in the context of any useful meaning, must be in regards to the document which has been put forth.

We don't care that they *HAVE* an original document. That does not address the point. It's just more crap from Captain Noise.

We don't care that the information contained on what has been put forth "matches" the information on the "original." That is also not the point. It is just another bit of craptacular diversion from the only thing that really matters.

Is the "original" document created in the normal manner from a Hospital, or was it created by the "say so" of someone such as Grandma Dunham?

Refusing to say that what is being put forth *IS* the original document, is just more legalistic bullshit crap the sort of which we have come to expect from Obama and the dodgers and weavers in the Hawaii department of health.

As has been pointed out countless times, the certification they put on the document which has been released is utterly useless. It proves that the document simply reflects whatever it is they have subsequently put into the record. It is a very different certification from the one used in the 1960s and later, to certify the document is a copy of the original. With the 1960s and later certification, there is no wiggle room.

What Obama's purported birth certificate "certifies" is:

I certify this is a true copy orabstract of the record on file in the Hawaii State Department of Health

For those of us who don't have infantile child minds, this means that it says whatever a court or bureaucrat has chosen to make it to say, and so therefore doesn't really confirm to the degree necessary a birth in the United States.

And once again, I will point out that the word "Original" does not appear anywhere in the certification of Obama's purported birth certificate.

You have been bitchslapped.... Again!

285 posted on 10/02/2015 8:19:21 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson