Make it anything you want. I don’t usually read past a couple of sentences from you. Sometimes not even that.
Life is too short for towering word walls, and I have not been following this discussion for that very reason. However, let me ask you something along these lines. Namely, if granny D. registered Little Barry’s birth, as many believe, then there would be something on file for Obama stating he was born in HI. So any official who said Obama’s file—however they worded it—indicated he was born in HI, would be telling the truth.
Later, when the cut and paste latter-day BC was created, it would be the “original BC”—i.e.: the first actual BC he ever had. So anyone saying, ‘this is a copy of the original BC,’ would be speaking accurately, no?
Of course my position is that when ALL the facts and evidence point to a non-HI birth, neither a cobbled-together BC nor any amount of hot air on the part of pols and their appointees means anything. I just don’t see that the hair splitting legalistic obots have a case. When it comes to career pols and their fellow taxpayer-$ sucking parasitic officials, integrity is not the norm. Indeed, these days integrity is rarely even the exception; it’s on the endangered list and disappearing fast.
No doubt observing all your points being shredded in reply may create undue cognitive dissonance. It's understandable that facing that in small quantities at a time is often required.