My point was that you were an idiot to claim that there was a law in effect in 1961 and then purport to support that assertion by linking to statutory law not enacted until 1982. And, as I've pointed out, this was all pointed out in effect two years ago. Though, curiously, back on that thread, you didn't say one peep about any territorial law supposedly saying the same thing as the 1982 law.
Now, in a desperate and futile attempt at saving face as I pummel you over this point, you finally dredge out some memorandum of law filed in a case by the losing party. You don't actually cite to any statute or attempt to show how it applies to Obama in 1961. In fact, it doesn't, as I've shown.
You can do your hand-wave and dance. But you can't really sustain the argument. Call it what you want; but you've stepped in it on this point in a big way, and the stench is all yours to enjoy.
The fact remains, Obama can have a fake birth certificate because the system is engineered to allow it.
Foreign births fall within this engineered-by-law, category, and Obama could very well be one of them, though the evidence indicates he was born in Canada, more so than anywhere else.
Grow up and quit dancing your little doggy dance because you think your little yap dog barking has chased away a car. No, the car pretty much just ignores you because you are trivial and irrelevant.