Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ShadowAce
To me what is interesting is not that they are using Linux - lots and lots of companies are. What is interesting is that Microsoft did not choose to build upon some part or parts of Windows.

Is this an admission that Windows is unsuitable for this kind of work/market? An admission that Windows internal design and architecture does not lend itself to the design approach taken here? If so, what does that say about Windows long-term in an ever expanding market? That is, desktops, laptops, tablets, phones, watches, Internet-of-things? Makes it seem like Windows is this monolithic, unwieldy beast trapped in an ever more limited cage...

5 posted on 09/22/2015 6:13:33 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ThunderSleeps
Excellent point. I think that is what is being said, though not quite as straightforward as you have. :)

Windows started life as, and continues to be, a desktop OS. The fact that is has been shoehorned into a server role speaks more to the creativity of MS than to the quality of the software.

6 posted on 09/22/2015 6:17:48 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux - The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson