[wideawake]

Let me guess - he tried to use an EBT card to purchase alcohol because he had a "connection" at the store. But the connection wasn't there, and the employee who was there wasn't playing ball - so he got aggressive.

And the security guard fixed it.

Why does it matter, I wonder, that the security guard was armed?

No rounds were fired, correct?

[lapsus calami]

 

 

They need to post the security vid from inside the store - you know darn well there is some - guarantee your theories will prove to be 100% correct.

 

 

[boop]

Great minds, wideawake.

The booze being denied situation makes great sense as well.

Another detail that seems strange is that the security guard locked the door after the so-called "beatdown" so that the guy couldn't re-enter the store.

Ask yourself why would he do that?

It implies that the guard thought the "victim" was going to try and re-enter the store and wreak MORE havoc.

The guard had a gun (but didn't use it), then locked the store.

I reason that the "victim" was making all kinds of threats, and the guard didn't want any innocent customers or employees FURTHER assaulted.

[sport]

It is another slap at the 2nd Amendment. A subtle way to associate guns and “violence”. “Armed Police” “unarmed teen” is another.