Did a Hacked Hillary Email Set Up the Ambush of Ambassador Christopher Stevens?

American Thinker ^ | 8/24/2015 | Thomas Lifson

[conservativejoy]

Putting together the information now publicly available, the question has to be asked: Did an ISIS hack of Hillary Clinton’s virtually defenseless home brew server set up the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens?

ISIS has proven itself adept enough at information technology that a successful hack of Hillary Clinton’s server at her Chappaqua mansion cannot be ruled out, no matter how many Secret Service members stood guard. Apparently unbeknownst to the former secretary of state who boasted of the server’s security because of the guards outside, it is so easy to hack a garden variety server set up by a mom-and-pop operation that an ISIS (and Russian intelligence and Chinese and Romanian and many other agencies) hack is well within the realm of possibility.

Now consider what the New York Post reported yesterday, six paragraphs into a story. Paul Sperry writes:

US intelligence officials so far have determined that at least four — and as many as 305 — of the more than 30,000 e-mails Clinton and her aides have printed out and turned over to investigators were classified at the time they were written.

They include a 2011 message from Clinton’s top aides that contains military intelligence from United States Africa Command gleaned from satellite images of troop movements in Libya, along with the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was later killed in a terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya. Another staff ­e-mail sent to Clinton in 2012 contained investigative data about Benghazi terrorist suspects wanted by the FBI. (emphasis added)

If the travel and protection plans for Ambassador Stevens were known to ISIS on September 10, 2011, then setting up the attack that resulted in his and three other Americans’ deaths would have been considerably aided.

[TheBattman]

Oh - and a review of the events , communications, and data leading up to the attack on the Benghazi compound, it is brutally evident that Ambassador Stevens was set-up, then hung out to die by this administration.

Hillary denied repeated requests for improved security - in fact, SHE DIRECTLY ordered CUTS in security. It was Hillary’s office that contracted with TERRORIST-alligned firm to provide “security”.

ISIS didn’t need to hack anyone’s email - they were given a green-light to kill the ambassador.

But again - what difference does it make now... Congress and our “system” will do nothing.

[wildbill]

Even if the emails weren’t hacked and had no impact on the Benghazi deaths, the very possibility that they could have been hacked shows the absolute incompetence of Hillary as a high official.

She valued her privacy more than the secrets of our government.

[conservativejoy]

You’ve cut exactly to the heart of the matter. That kind of dangerously gross incompetence is not something we can afford in a national leader entrusted with security information.

[WaterWeWaitinFor]

I have said from the beginning this was going to be a Blind Sheikh for Stevens swap..it would have made Obama look like a hero getting our Ambassador back safely and all that had to happen was us giving up the Blind Sheikh..Look what he did, giving up four terrorists to get back one traitor so Obama could have done this before the election thinking it could help him win easily”

TOTALLY agree with you. TOTALLY. Now why don’t we see what e-mail ValJar had with anyone prior to and during and after that tragic night. She was in charge, NOT zippy, who was ahem... unavailable .... The phone lines and e-mails or text messages had to be burning up the wires, so to speak. The GOPe are in on all this, including the IRS targeting the conservatives - as they wanted to CRUSH us, so why not in on this disaster also.

Note how quiet the scum leaders of the GOPe are, during all this debate? Sickening isn’t it? What do others think?