Sounds good. “Diamonds in the sky” is better than pie in the sky.
I didn’t see anywhere in the article how much CO2 they envisage using. It doesn’t sound like enough to put a dent in power-plant emissions.
The Weekly Standard recently had an article on using power-plant CO2 emissions, to pump undergrown for enhanced oil recovery.
Using CO2 for enhanced oil recovery has been profitably done for a long time, but it’s limited to being currently feasible only where there’s naturally occurring CO2 compounds to use.
The Weekly Standard article envisaged using power-plant emissions to ramp up enhanced oil recovery. It may be pie in the sky, but the writer made an interesting case.
Almost everyone at this stage sees “pie in the sky” profits and carbon usage but the article promotes it as significant agains the demand for the fiber.
You bought into the CO2 is a Pollutant or a Problem Lie?
Sheesh