Earnings is a small difference between two large numbers - revenue and expenses. Consequently projected earnings are particularly volatile.Climate too is driven by potentially modellable physical laws. Do we really understand those laws and the complex interaction of these laws well enough to accurately model climate? I dont think so.
I am suspicious of the climate models because they seem wildly complex on the one hand, and seem to depend on a simple, arbitrary assumption of the sensitivity of temp to CO2 on the other. Apparently this model did not start out with a desired conclusion - high sensitivity to CO2 - embedded as a planted axiom before the calculations ever start.
One for Two. Not bad.