Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: big'ol_freeper

Brady jock sniffers at it again. After first court meeting the sniffers all hailed Brady’s great performance and the Judges leaning toward him. Then we learned Brady is willing to accept a suspension but not for cheating, pnly for obstruction. Question is what’s to obstruct if you are not guilty and WHY did pats pay the fine if they did nothing wrong?

Brady’s rep is shot at this point and the longer he drags this out the worse he looks. As of now over 70% of NFL fans believe he was involved in the cheating and as we all know perception is reality.

All Brady’s past accomplishments are being called onto question as will his future ones. And all the jock sniffers, like this author are beside themselves because the object of their fantasy has lost his luster.


11 posted on 08/19/2015 1:13:17 PM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: billyboy15

1) this guy isn’t a Pats fan.

2) you got pretty much every objective fact wrong. The months of lying by the NFL misinformed a lot of people who didn’t dig in to the details. Even those who did were mislead by outright and clear misrepresentation by the league when they held the transcripts sealed. The leak on the settlement was from the league, and appears to - again - have no basis in reality.

The NFL has already stated under oath that there’s no evidence of Brady involvement in any conspiracy to deflate footballs. They are arguing that even wrong, Goodell has the authority to impose punishment and that the court can’t challenge that.

Wells has also conceded that they are only arguing about .1-.2 PSI, with unknowns much larger than that.


20 posted on 08/19/2015 4:14:10 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: billyboy15

Totally agree


61 posted on 08/27/2015 1:05:17 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Liberals hate the term "illegal immigrant" unless you are referring to a baby they plan to abort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson