Again. You tell me where I’m lying. What EXACTLY did I say that was completely fabricated and made up? You cant. You just don’t want to hear anything that disrupts your personal narrative that Linux is flawless. Instead you actually lower yourself to say this:
“that’s the attitude that comes from watching one poster come onto Linux threads for only one reason—to badmouth it and provide no meaningful contribution to the discussion whatsoever.”
That is the bulls*it language that leftists use to try to shut people up that they don’t agree with. The tactic of dismissal by deeming one’s experience as not being “helpful” to the discussion while not having to address the substance of it (which would require effort). And why exactly isn’t it “contributing”? Because I didn’t say what you what to hear?
Well sorry about that, special snowflake, but I’m not going to lie to spare your bizarre emotional attachment to an OS. Hell the entire damn thread is basically about how much Windows sucks, but apparently that “badmouthing” is A-OK. But let someone give an alternative viewpoint on their experience with Linux and NOW there is a problem?
“When a person genuinely wants assistance, I am more than happy to provide it.”
Why? Linux HAS NO ISSUES, remember?
Another strawman. Show me where I said you were lying.
Linux HAS NO ISSUES, remember?
Wow. Comprehension is difficult for you, isn't it?