Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War in Space May Be Closer Than Ever
scientificamerican.com ^ | August 10, 2015 | Lee Billings |

Posted on 08/11/2015 10:34:52 AM PDT by BenLurkin

Low- and high-Earth orbits have become hotbeds of scientific and commercial activity, filled with hundreds upon hundreds of satellites from about 60 different nations. Despite their largely peaceful purposes, each and every satellite is at risk, in part because not all members of the growing club of military space powers are willing to play by the same rules—and they don’t have to, because the rules remain as yet unwritten.

...Satellites race through space at very high velocities, so the quickest, dirtiest way to kill one is to simply launch something into space to get in its way. Even the impact of an object as small and low-tech as a marble can disable or entirely destroy a billion-dollar satellite. And if a nation uses such a “kinetic” method to destroy an adversary’s satellite, it can easily create even more dangerous debris, potentially cascading into a chain reaction that transforms Earth orbit into a demolition derby.

In 2007 the risks from debris skyrocketed when China launched a missile that destroyed one of its own weather satellites in low-Earth orbit. That test generated a swarm of long-lived shrapnel that constitutes nearly one-sixth of all the radar-trackable debris in orbit....

More recently, China has launched what many experts say are additional tests of ground-based anti-satellite kinetic weapons. None of these subsequent launches have destroyed satellites, but Krepon and other experts say this is because the Chinese are now merely testing to miss, rather than to hit, with the same hostile capability as an end result. The latest test occurred on July 23 of last year. Chinese officials insist the tests’ only purpose is peaceful missile defense and scientific experimentation. But one test in May 2013 sent a missile soaring as high as 30,000 kilometers above Earth, approaching the safe haven of strategic geosynchronous satellites.

(Excerpt) Read more at scientificamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: gps; redchina
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 08/11/2015 10:34:52 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

As long as George Clooney dies at the end, I can tolerate deris in low Earth orbit.


2 posted on 08/11/2015 10:41:14 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan ('Zionists crept into my home and stole my shoe' - Headline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

“Debris”

Damn LG G4. Don’t ever buy one!


3 posted on 08/11/2015 10:47:57 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan ('Zionists crept into my home and stole my shoe' - Headline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Won't enough scattered debris decrease the amount of sunlight reaching the earth, and therefore reduce global warming?

Let the crashes begin! Stuff to watch at night!

4 posted on 08/11/2015 10:54:07 AM PDT by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Satellites and space stations could soon knock missiles out and make ICBM’s obsolete


5 posted on 08/11/2015 11:02:25 AM PDT by GeronL (Cruz is for real, 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Reactivate that group of space combat marines that were in Moonraker.


6 posted on 08/11/2015 11:03:10 AM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

It began decades ago. There is already a space combat center. Lots of obviously classified activities, but space combat has been going on and will continue to go on.


7 posted on 08/11/2015 11:03:40 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

“Satellites and space stations could soon knock missiles out and make ICBM’s obsolete”

Not even close to reality. Regardless of weapons platform, hitting enough warheads is simply not reality yet. The decoys, diffusions, and various counter tactics keeps that from being reality.


8 posted on 08/11/2015 11:04:56 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Not yet. In one of my sci-fi stories it was 2140 and ICBM’s are pretty obsolete. They still have bayonets of course.


9 posted on 08/11/2015 11:07:24 AM PDT by GeronL (Cruz is for real, 100%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Alien Bill Paxton photo: Aliens 1.jpg
10 posted on 08/11/2015 11:12:27 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I often wonder what replaced the early ASAT weapons carried by F-15 and similar. They were quietly dropped, no doubt to appease someone, but far too useful to just go away.


11 posted on 08/11/2015 11:17:02 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

I bet USAF or USN has a project to orbit an empty robot reentry vehicle that can snatch an enemy satellite from orbit and bring it down intact.

I wonder if this is something Elon Musk is working on the qt. Might explain his deep pocket funding sources.


12 posted on 08/11/2015 11:27:12 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
I often wonder what replaced the early ASAT weapons carried by F-15 and similar. They were quietly dropped, no doubt to appease someone, but far too useful to just go away.

Pegasus launch system is active. It's last (listed) use was in June 2013. Another Pegasus launch is scheduled for October 2016.

Perhaps this system was determined to be a cheaper COTS solution to the ASAT problem.

13 posted on 08/11/2015 11:32:15 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Not a problem. We have one of these.


14 posted on 08/11/2015 11:37:31 AM PDT by McGruff (Trump/Cruz 2016 - My Dream Team)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom; doorgunner69

The Navy S3 Standard missile also has antisat capabilities.

The Block IIA missile has a top speed of Mach 15, and a maximum altitude of over 900 miles.


15 posted on 08/11/2015 11:38:57 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty
Oh yeah, of course I forgot.

SM3 has whacked a bunch of satellites in orbit.

IIRC, the Ethan Allen has quite a record of sat-swatting.

I think the USN has pretty much demonstrated that it can take out any satellite it wants at any time, at least in LEO.

16 posted on 08/11/2015 11:41:18 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

“Satellites and space stations could soon knock missiles out and make ICBM’s obsolete”

IMO, they have been obsolete for decades. The orbital phase makes ICBMs sitting ducks.

We know every launch for the past ~30 years can be detected and tracked by satellite. It’s not that much of a stretch to assume we can also point and shoot lasers at what we are tracking.


17 posted on 08/11/2015 11:46:10 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PreciousLiberty

Problem with Aegis on a ship is it needs to be fairly near the orbital track and is not going to be able to reposition quickly. An airborne solution can.


18 posted on 08/11/2015 11:47:05 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: varyouga

Tracking a 28 inch by 18 inch stealth warhead is extremely difficult.


19 posted on 08/11/2015 11:53:24 AM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

stay frosty.


20 posted on 08/11/2015 11:58:34 AM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson