To: dware
"sample after sample" shows bacterial concentrations are "highest where there were higher numbers of septic systems in the watershed area,"
Well there's a shocker.
3 posted on
08/04/2015 1:29:34 PM PDT by
cripplecreek
(Sad fact, most people just want a candidate to tell them what they want to hear)
To: cripplecreek
"sample after sample" What a crappy job.
13 posted on
08/04/2015 1:43:58 PM PDT by
dware
(Yeah, so? What are we going to do about it?)
To: cripplecreek
I’ll wager there are higher levels of poo in the water when there are cattle and other livestock in the watershed area. Probably the same general areas where septic tanks are found.
31 posted on
08/04/2015 2:11:43 PM PDT by
Sasparilla
(If you want peace, prepare for war.)
To: cripplecreek
.
>> “Well there’s a shocker.” <<
.
To the enviroNazi, life is a shocker.
53 posted on
08/04/2015 2:40:04 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson