Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Lives They Lived: Fred C. Trump, b. 1905; The Fred
http://www.nytimes.com ^ | 1/ 2/2000 | Phillip Weiss

Posted on 07/31/2015 5:58:01 PM PDT by conservativejoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last
To: hoosiermama

Ok, just did another keyword search on Repository Trump. A lot came up posted by others, I was under the impression that it was all your postings. lol


181 posted on 10/27/2015 8:49:56 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

I just categorize it under repository trump. Sort of a private library of threads that I can choose to share and refer to when needed . I’ve got a couple more too but much less material in them.


182 posted on 10/27/2015 8:56:01 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: annieokie

I just categorize it under repository trump. Sort of a private library of threads that I can choose to share and refer to when needed . I’ve got a couple more too but much less material in them.


183 posted on 10/27/2015 8:56:04 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Saved it here!

Http://www.thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2015/08/donald-trump-is-genius-but-thats-just.html


184 posted on 11/05/2015 8:37:06 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Perfect!!


185 posted on 11/05/2015 8:38:26 PM PST by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

Do you know how to find it? Just put RepositoryTrump in keyword search. There are about three pages of articles now. Its at the bottom of the last page. Well hidden.


186 posted on 11/05/2015 8:46:29 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Yes.

Thanks!!!


187 posted on 11/05/2015 8:50:25 PM PST by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; nopardons; Black Agnes

I am looking for the material of Trumps sister and the controversial decision that the CRUZ bots are twisting to make he look pro abortion. Do you have any idea where it is ?
Thought it was here or in “repository Trump”

They are posting some far left articles now that are not truthful


188 posted on 02/27/2016 7:40:24 AM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

You’ve got mail.


189 posted on 02/27/2016 8:22:38 AM PST by Jane Long (Go Trump, go! Make America Safe Again :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Planned Parenthood of Central New Jersey v. Farmer, et. al., 220 F.3d 127 (3d Cir. 2000).
During the late 1990’s a number of different courts across the nation considered the constitutionality of state laws purporting to limit the constitutionally intact dilation and extraction procedures sometimes referred to by opponents as “partial birth abortion.” The Third Circuit considered such a law in New Jersey. After the Third Circuit opinion was drafted, but before it was issued, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Stenberg v. Carhart (530 U.S. 914 (2000)) which struck down a late term abortion law very similar to the one at issue in New Jersey. As the Third Circuit had already determined that the law was unconstitutionally vague, they issued their opinion written by Judge Maryanne Trump Barry unchanged except to note, in the beginning of the opinion, the intervening opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court. The opinion is a lengthy discussion of the constitutional inadequacies of the New Jersey statute. Alito wrote separately to state that he believed that the whole majority opinion was “never necessary and is now obsolete.” 220 F.3d at 152. He would have preferred that the court simply hold that the New Jersey statute was unconstitutional because it did not contain an exception for situations in which the health of the mother was endangered as required by the Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart and because the statute would have applied to more than just intact dilation and extraction.

http://media.pfaw.org/stc/AlitoPreliminary.pdf


190 posted on 02/27/2016 8:31:04 AM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: DollyCali

https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10205751786815903&id=1293035689&set=a.10200321945553265.1073741826.1293035689&source=57&refid=52&ref=m_notif&notif_t=comment_mention&_ft_=top_level_post_id.10205751789135961%3Atl_objid.10205751789135961%3Athid.1293035689&__tn__=E#


191 posted on 03/05/2016 9:49:57 PM PST by hoosiermama (Make America Great Again by uniting Great Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: IwaCornDogs

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3521665/Ivanka-Trump-steps-looking-incredibly-trim-baby-son-s-circumcision-ceremony-week-giving-birth.html

Thanks. Enjoy the thread. Post 3& 8 have long family history


192 posted on 04/03/2016 11:41:30 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Trump makes me smile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

This was an awesome read.

People, this is the kind of person we need as President. Not a guy whose dad was a drunk skirt chaser who then became a cult preacher. Who didn’t give a poop what country his son was in, had no real country affiliation, no patriotism.

And I’m glad Cruz is now patriotic (and I believe he is), but my dad of blessed memory was patriotic too, for the land that took him in when no one else would, for the land where he got an education and could make the American Dream happen. But my dad was as ineligible as Cruz is.

Anyway, Trump is the guy. We need him.


193 posted on 04/04/2016 10:14:54 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I’m just having a ball on this thread, hm, thanks so much for sharing!

I specifically have been focused on your posts 3 & 8, there is so much information throughout, I’ve confused myself to the point where I was going to respond to a comment about the “house flipping grandmother” with this gem ....

“Elizabeth was considered the matriarch of the Trump family. She had “extraordinary determination”.[5] She dressed very formally, was hardworking and had a stern demeanor. She remained close to her son Fred for her entire life.[2]”

... But lost the thread the comment was on, lol ...

Gee, now who else do we know who fits this description? Ha! Donald appears to be her very spirit! No wonder he loves the women he does, and more importantly has raised and is surrounded by The Next Generation of Trump Women and Men.
Too Cool!

I also have been harboring some great pics that I’ve never been quite sure where to post.
Hope you don’t mind if I leave them here for yours, or others enjoyment. They aren’t something I’ve come across on a frequent basis ... maybe some have seen, but some may not have... (I’ll post them later, if that’s ok)

P.s. I’m fascinated with Elizabeth’s name/maiden name (?) of Christ. Do you have any history of that? Quite unique, uncommon, bold devotion? ~

P.s.s I also wonder who he got his funny from ... Because he sure makes me laugh & smile when he throws it in the mix ~ I think he’s hilarious ... When he wants to be :)


194 posted on 04/04/2016 4:15:01 PM PDT by IwaCornDogs (G. Washington/W. Churchill//D. Trump ~ Men for their time, cut of the same cloth ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: IwaCornDogs

I’m going to assume the humor comes from Frederick ... Hanging around all those boom-town hotels, restaurants & brothels will do that to ya, hahaha


195 posted on 04/04/2016 4:23:05 PM PDT by IwaCornDogs (G. Washington/W. Churchill//D. Trump ~ Men for their time, cut of the same cloth ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57; nopardons; Jane Long

“Are you better off now than you were four years ago?”

Mr. Trumps letter:

On Saturday, April 9, Colorado had an “election” without voters. Delegates were chosen on behalf of a presidential nominee, yet the people of Colorado were not able to cast their ballots to say which nominee they preferred.

A planned vote had been canceled. And one million Republicans in Colorado were sidelined.

In recent days, something all too predictable has happened: Politicians furiously defended the system. “These are the rules,” we were told over and over again. If the “rules” can be used to block Coloradans from voting on whether they want better trade deals, or stronger borders, or an end to special-interest vote-buying in Congress—well, that’s just the system and we should embrace it.

Let me ask America a question: How has the “system” been working out for you and your family?

I, for one, am not interested in defending a system that for decades has served the interest of political parties at the expense of the people. Members of the club—the consultants, the pollsters, the politicians, the pundits and the special interests—grow rich and powerful while the American people grow poorer and more isolated.

No one forced anyone to cancel the vote in Colorado. Political insiders made a choice to cancel it. And it was the wrong choice.

Responsible leaders should be shocked by the idea that party officials can simply cancel elections in America if they don’t like what the voters may decide.

The only antidote to decades of ruinous rule by a small handful of elites is a bold infusion of popular will. On every major issue affecting this country, the people are right and the governing elite are wrong. The elites are wrong on taxes, on the size of government, on trade, on immigration, on foreign policy.

Why should we trust the people who have made every wrong decision to substitute their will for America’s will in this presidential election?

Here, I part ways with Sen. Ted Cruz.

Mr. Cruz has toured the country bragging about his voterless victory in Colorado. For a man who styles himself as a warrior against the establishment (you wouldn’t know it from his list of donors and endorsers), you’d think he would be demanding a vote for Coloradans. Instead, Mr. Cruz is celebrating their disenfranchisement.

Likewise, Mr. Cruz loudly boasts every time party insiders disenfranchise voters in a congressional district by appointing delegates who will vote the opposite of the expressed will of the people who live in that district.

That’s because Mr. Cruz has no democratic path to the nomination. He has been mathematically eliminated by the voters.

While I am self-funding, Mr. Cruz rakes in millions from special interests. Yet despite his financial advantage, Mr. Cruz has won only three primaries outside his home state and trails me by two million votes—a gap that will soon explode even wider. Mr. Cruz loses when people actually get to cast ballots. Voter disenfranchisement is not merely part of the Cruz strategy—it is the Cruz strategy.

The great irony of this campaign is that the “Washington cartel” that Mr. Cruz rails against is the very group he is relying upon in his voter-nullification scheme.

My campaign strategy is to win with the voters. Ted Cruz’s campaign strategy is to win despite them.

What we are seeing now is not a proper use of the rules, but a flagrant abuse of the rules. Delegates are supposed to reflect the decisions of voters, but the system is being rigged by party operatives with “double-agent” delegates who reject the decision of voters.

The American people can have no faith in such a system. It must be reformed.

Just as I have said that I will reform our unfair trade, immigration and economic policies that have also been rigged against Americans, so too will I work closely with the chairman of the Republican National Committee and top GOP officials to reform our election policies. Together, we will restore the faith—and the franchise—of the American people.

We must leave no doubt that voters, not donors, choose the nominee.

How have we gotten to the point where politicians defend a rigged delegate-selection process with more passion than they have ever defended America’s borders?

Perhaps it is because politicians care more about securing their private club than about securing their country.

My campaign will, of course, battle for every last delegate. We will work within the system that exists now, while fighting to have it reformed in the future. But we will do it the right way. My campaign will seek maximum transparency, maximum representation and maximum voter participation.

We will run a campaign based on empowering voters, not sidelining them.

Let us take inspiration from patriotic Colorado citizens who have banded together in protest. Let us make Colorado a rallying cry on behalf of all the forgotten people whose desperate pleas have for decades fallen on the deaf ears and closed eyes of our rulers in Washington, D.C.

The political insiders have had their way for a long time. Let 2016 be remembered as the year the American people finally got theirs.

Mr. Trump is a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination.


196 posted on 04/15/2016 5:37:28 AM PDT by hoosiermama (W1240 (a couple extra to boot) Under budget. Ahead of schedule! Go TRUMP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson