You say that yet Trump was on national TV this morning calling Shrillary a criminal and that she shouldn't even be running for president. So how do you square his words with your cockamamie assertions?
Also, you seem to be stating that Donald Trump, with his massive ego and his billions of dollars, would allow himself to be used as a tool by a shrill, unlikeable far-left anti-American marxist old hag like Shrillary?
You are not the only one implying that Donald Trump is some sort of "stalking horse" for the Democrats. But the more one looks at the facts, the more ridiculous this scenario becomes.
Hillary does not have her own ability to put together a good campaign and yes, does appear to be un-liked.
She still has a D in front of her name - gets her every retired person by default, a majority of college students, the minority votes. She’ll also get those who remember the Clinton days as good days and every big government suckling teet out there.
Her friends and husband both have to work this out.
There’s no actual facts, only Trump and words. Why take his words seriously now and forget or disregard what he’s done in the pastor his statements? He’s good at working a deal in and can’t be trusted.
The media will push Hillary despite all the baggage, they’ve already been paid to do so.
The media will also push Bush, we can see that with that 14% garbage.
Bush gets it, Trump goes third party, Clinton wins due to Perot 2.0 .
Ted Cruz, Fiorina, Walker are my current trusted picks.