Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

The biker uniform indicates, at least in the eyes of most everybody else, that the wearer is violent and dangerous.

Since the wearers know this, if they did not wish to be viewed as violent and dangerous, they’d change their attire to something that did not project this image.

Since they cling to that image, it’s perfectly obvious that’s how they want to be seen.

Fine, that’s their privilege. But the flip side of being able to get a charge out of intimidating others is that those others just don’t get very upset when your civil rights are violated.

Not saying they’re right to feel that way, just that they do.


26 posted on 07/12/2015 6:35:07 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
-- But the flip side of being able to get a charge out of intimidating others is that those others just don't get very upset when your civil rights are violated. --

True enough. See Niemoeller. Your turn in the barrel may come, someday.

In the Twin Peaks case, the stigma is more difficult to attach to those members who were in plain clothes.

29 posted on 07/12/2015 6:42:13 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson