Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IYAS9YAS

Of course, the ecology adapted to one with extensive fires, that repeatedly reset the plant succession. The notion that fires “do harm to nature” is not really one that stands up well to analysis.

Any large wooded area that didn’t have fires would soon reach climax forest and stay there. Which would be very bad news for the majority of plants and animals that can’t live in such an environment.

For the most part, climax forests are relatively sterile places. The most productive natural environments are usually “edge” environments, where, for instance, meadows intermingle with forest.


22 posted on 07/10/2015 11:53:19 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan
Any large wooded area that didn’t have fires would soon reach climax forest and stay there.

Kinda debunks the "Old Growth" forest crap, doesn't it.

I'm not saying I think that natives were bad, they did what they had to in order to live. I'm just sick and tired of people harkening back to the bad old days thinking they were so peaceful and bucolic.

25 posted on 07/10/2015 12:10:10 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Has anyone seen my tagline? It was here yesterday. I seem to have misplaced it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson