Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright
He almost surely meant simplicity of use - of portability.

That's not what he said. His statement was - "the instruments through which we shall be able to do [t]his will be amazingly simple compared with our present telephone".

I suspect he envisioned a system akin to his idea of power transmission to everybody with no moving parts, just a bunch of antennae put up to catch electricity from the air.

53 posted on 07/07/2015 6:31:30 AM PDT by pa_dweller (But 'twould be an ill world for weaponless dreamers if evil men were not now and then slain - JRK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: pa_dweller

Your analysis is in a vacuum IMO....taking the literal statement but NOT putting it in context of everything else he nailed! Context matters. We’ll never know....but I am confident I got this....


54 posted on 07/07/2015 6:33:16 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson