To: 14themunny; 21stCenturion; 300magnum; A Strict Constructionist; abigail2; AdvisorB; Aggie Mama; ...
Federalist/Anti-Federalist ping. If you substitute the name “Hamilton” for “Lincoln,” you get to the basic argument that illuminated the debate over the Constitution and America’s future.
13 posted on
07/05/2015 3:39:36 PM PDT by
Publius
("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
To: Publius
If you are maintaining a federalist/anti-federalist ping list, count me in!
100 posted on
07/05/2015 5:20:00 PM PDT by
BlackElk
(Dean of Discipline: Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society/Rack 'em Danno!)
To: Publius
187 posted on
07/06/2015 6:30:17 AM PDT by
Canedawg
(Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. –Gal. 6:7)
To: Publius
If you substitute the name Hamilton for Lincoln, you get to the basic argument that illuminated the debate over the Constitution and Americas futureAccording to the article, the gist of the debate between Lincoln (heir to the Federalist tradition) and the Jeffersonian anti-Federalist tradition is whether the US would be a commercial/manufacturing economic power or an agrarian nation. I agree that ultimately it's THIS question, rather than tariffs/free trade or slavery/anti-slavery was the fundamental divide between Federalist and Anti-Federalists, and the ideological difference between Union and Confederacy.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson