Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tax-chick

My reasoning is just that A child i better with original single parent than two adopted parents, assuming the single original parent/family can provide for them.

Because the original parent IS the original parent.

Now ideally we have two original married parents. That is a given. Arguing anything else is insanity. And to be sure tow adoptive parents are a great and wonderful thing.

Thats not the situation. The situation is a single parent that can and most likely will provide a good home for the child no different/better/worse than tens of millions of other families.

Now WHY a bunch of people on the internet FEEL, like most liberals, that they get to look down their noses when it is a dead set certainty that their own families have their own share of dysfunction in someone elses eyes, I am at a loss to explain other than understanding fully that most of these people are completely full of Alaskan Grizzly feces and they think it’s cool to show it in public like a trophy.


34 posted on 07/02/2015 3:02:51 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Norm Lenhart
My reasoning is just that A child i better with original single parent than two adopted parents, assuming the single original parent/family can provide for them. Because the original parent IS the original parent.

That is a very silly thing to say. My wife, who was adopted, and who later gave up a baby for adoption, would tell you that in much stronger terms.

68 posted on 07/02/2015 4:28:54 PM PDT by TexasBarak (I aim to misbehave!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson