Here's a solution. Look carefully at the dialogue in the following thread.
Scott Walker, Set for a Bigger Stage, Faces G.O.P Revolt in Wisconsinhttp://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3306277/posts
Bear with me here. Which constituencies are sucking up big debt/revenues while doing whatever they can to crush any attempts to start new, small manufacturing shops without high flooring costs (e.g., leases at local "industrial parks")?
Heavy Hitters: Top All-Time Donors, 1989-2014http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/list.phpAmerican Fedn of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,949,129 [Democrat] 81% [Republican] 1%
Planners, inspectors, other regulators, fire departments that take "impact fees," local real estate and property tax interests (zoning against new, small rural manufacturing shops), teachers, administrators and instructors who don't want "males" at work, like-minded social workers, psychologists, government-connected services owned by homos, global corporates owned by the same,...
One thing that has become very clear over the years, is that such socialist interests don't want to see men and heterosexual families at work and prosperous.
The only candidate proven to cut spending to such interests is Scott Walker, and he was born right here, in the U.S.A.
The less money and time the domestic enemies have, the less influence that they'll have in politics. We've been trying to nominate lying politicians who funnel big government cash flow to them for too long--some even with public school teachers as immediate family members. Those politicians are the ones making promises that are too good to be true. They're con artists.
Cut the big government spending at every level including state and local. Only then, will you see much new manufacturing production on U.S. soil.
I agree in essence with your point, but note that cutting government spending at every level will not come from the sphere of electoral politics. Where reductions in spending will come from, though, Is a reduction in revenue. Or said another way, taxes get cut when they aren’t paid. Either legally or not.
I think that the way of the future is manufacturing and studying it is something people should do. I’m not optimistic though as to regulatory costs being cut. They will be cut for some, i.e. those who figure out a way around them, but that’s about it. Power never relinquishes power voluntarily.