The current liberal take on Sodom was that it was destroyed for lack of hospitality.
I heard that too, so stupid it’s funny.
Having the male townsfolk gather round to anal rape you would indeed be regarded as a lack of hospitality.
That certainly makes the fire and brimstone destruction far outsized for mere “lack of hospitality”, doesn’t it. Genesis 18:20 describes Sodom’s sin as “very grievous”, and “lack of hospitality” does not fit such a description, nor is threatening to sodomize Lot’s guests a mere “lack of hospitality”.