Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dennisw

Was Swift going to abstain for the three months?

She and her company surely did not need to abstain, it would certainly not have been any financial hardship for them.

But now, the majors will all be involved and swamp the indies.

This only helps already established corporate acts and greatly hurts exposure of lesser know independents and smaller labels.

It was in no way an altruistic move, in fact quite the opposite.


6 posted on 06/22/2015 6:34:57 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan

No, she wasn’t going to let them license her albums at all. Or something like that.


17 posted on 06/22/2015 8:32:57 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson