[Timber Rattler]

You, and another dozen or so FReepers should be committed to a mental institution, because you can no longer think in a rational fashion about TPA, TAA and TPP and the difference between them.

So, you're all for a secret deal that Obama himself is demanding, that would greatly expand his power, while diminishing the Senate's constitutional treaty ratification power?

Gotcha.

[arthurus]

That is the rational approach for those who strive for a permanent Democrat/Communist majority, or perhaps a Moslem tyranny.

[USS Alaska]

So, you're all for a secret deal that Obama himself is demanding, that would greatly expand his power, while diminishing the Senate's constitutional treaty ratification power?

No, but I am in favor of TPA {which is not secret}, not TAA nor the current TPP agreement {which I have not read} for obama as well as for President Cruz.

The current TPP can be voted down with 51 Votes and if it is not good, then the senate can and should vote it down.

The TPA law will extend for the next President, something that the semonRAT senators would never let come to a vote for a pubbie President Cruz.

And if you are going to tell me that the senate cannot be trusted to vote down a bad trade bill, then we are truly lost.