Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2

I’m no expert, but I’ve read that the majority of the surface is dark like as asphalt. They bumped up the exposure to bring out detail in the dark surface, but that blows out anything that’s brighter than the dark surface. So the bright spots may be barely white, or gray.


17 posted on 06/10/2015 11:36:46 PM PDT by catbertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: catbertz

That makes sense. Yep totally blown out.

You’d think they would have been more focused on these bright areas since they knew these features existed when the spacecraft imaged Ceres on approach long ago. I am surprised they didn’t shoot the target using several different exposures/filters etc. I think one of the cameras has 7 different filters, infrared mapping spectrometers etc.

Even at a distance of 45k kilometers back in February, these bright spots seemed extremely bright. Or were possibly captured using longer exposures back then as well.


18 posted on 06/11/2015 12:27:16 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson