Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sten
using YOUR understanding, the son of william and kate, if born in NYC, could one day be president and king. OBVIOUSLY, your understanding of the term is incorrect.

The 14th Amendment says:

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.
The bolded part, in the discussion of the amendment, was meant to exclude children of diplomats born in the US. It would also exclude foreign kings and other persons with diplomatic immunity. It would specifically INCLUDE children of legal immigrants.

An argument could be made that the clause would exclude babies born to people illegally in the US.

260 posted on 06/07/2015 6:02:37 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

the 14th amendment didn’t exist at the time A2S1C5 was written. even if it did, it only addresses citizenship and not natural born status.

the point here is the definition of ‘natural born citizen’ as understood and meant by the founders.


263 posted on 06/07/2015 6:24:22 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson