Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sten

Actually it is you who is wrong.

A person who does not need to be naturalized is naturally born a citizen. Citizen at birth means that they are naturally born a citizen and thus qualify as a natural born citizen. The very first Congress established this in their very first acts on the subject.


241 posted on 06/07/2015 2:59:49 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

incorrect.

NATURAL BORN CITIZEN was used by the founders to insure no split allegiances, at least by birth, as well as no foreign king able to one day be president of the US.

using YOUR understanding, the son of william and kate, if born in NYC, could one day be president and king. OBVIOUSLY, your understanding of the term is incorrect.

and the very first congress did address this... using the common term ‘natural born citizen’ ... which has only been muddied by those trying to get their ineligible candidate into the office.


245 posted on 06/07/2015 3:09:55 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

“A person who does not need to be naturalized is naturally born a citizen.”

So, by your definition, every anchor baby is eligible to be POTUS.


248 posted on 06/07/2015 4:11:22 PM PDT by Erik Latranyi (President Walker - Attorney General Cruz (enforcing immigration laws for real))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson