Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
At the time, women were prisoners of their husbands - if the husbands were so inclined. They could not inherit, their father's lands were assigned to the husband and they could not get custody of children in a divorce. Ever read A Doll's House? Ever read Charlotte Bronte? These works of literature did not come out of some angry bitch's imagination - they came out of the mind's of great men and women as products of the Enlightenment tradition.
54 posted on 06/03/2015 3:08:45 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: "I should like to drive away not only the Turks (moslims) but all my foes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: miss marmelstein

That’s how the liberal propaganda line reads. And look at the results of attacking the traditional family, on any basis.

Mill is a century too late for the Enlightenment, as is Brontë. Mill’s economic theories were anti-capitalist and even socialistic; Brontë associated herself with people like Harriet Martineau, an associate of Charles Darwin whose views on the poor were called “Malthusian” by Tories of the era.


56 posted on 06/03/2015 3:20:12 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

To: miss marmelstein

Women prisoners to their husband’s, that’s hogwash and feminist indoctrination.

A marriage between a man and a woman is ordained by God and is holy and acceptable in God’s sight.


57 posted on 06/03/2015 3:29:50 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist (BeThe Keystone Pipe lik ProjectR : build it already Congre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson