Also of note - according to the police report, not one, but two attorneys engaged by Jim Bob on the case declined to be the attorney of record.
Now I’m a bit unclear...(not being negative or snarky) could you clarify your opinion as to the implications as to why the attorneys in question declined to be the attorneys of record? Do you think they saw the case as being potentially a downer to their reputations if they took the case? Could their records have been supoena’ed in some future case if one or the other had been the “attorney of record”?