Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pollster1

not so. Those paying in the minimum get many times back their contributions. SS is extremely socialized or progressive. Look at the SS calculations - there are 3 tiers. The lowest tier uses 90% of the amount paid in, the 2nd uses 32%, the last 15%. Then, there is a minimum payment that if one’s AIME is below a certain indexed number, they get the minimum payment no matter how little they paid in. And of course, the linger one lives the more they collect.

You are completely ignoring the calculations and facts. I find a lit of conservatives, especially those collecting SS refuse to see what a ponzi scheme SS is. If you were right, it wouldn’t be bankrupt. No wonder politicians are afraid to touch it.


8 posted on 05/23/2015 5:42:17 AM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Hardens Hollow

I only did the numbers for my own income, and I lose a lot on social security. Adjusted for present value, I’d still lose even if I lived to age 100.


9 posted on 05/23/2015 5:45:58 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Hardens Hollow
Look at the SS calculations - there are 3 tiers. The lowest tier uses 90% of the amount paid in, the 2nd uses 32%, the last 15%.

And they're still going broke.

10 posted on 05/23/2015 5:49:37 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson