Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

The sequels to ‘First Blood’ have all been terrible.


52 posted on 05/21/2015 8:39:21 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Borges

Most sequels are worse than the original.

There are a few that are well written and directed that actually carry on the story line. Then you have others where the studios cut corners to milk the cash cow for all its worth.

There are some movies that are instant classics and should not have sequels or be remade. For example “Red Dawn”, and “The Crow” are two of those instant classics IMO that should have never been touched. They ruined The Crow by making that horrid sequel The Crow - City of Angels and the five other progressively wretched sequels. Now they’re working on remaking the original. Then there is Red Dawn. The original featured Russians, Cubans, and Sandinistas invading us which was a very plausible story line. In the remake they got rid of the Russians because they didn’t want to get Putin’s red lace panties all in a was, and they wrote out those human cockroaches from south of the border because that’s too close to what’s really going on.


54 posted on 05/21/2015 9:36:12 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (Making harmless people defenseless, does not make dangerous people harmless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson