Posted on 05/18/2015 11:52:06 AM PDT by Citizen Zed
Edited on 05/18/2015 12:03:34 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
YouTube should not have been forced to take down an anti-Muslim film that sparked violence in the Middle East and death threats to actors, a federal appeals court ruled Monday in a victory for free speech advocates.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal sided with Google, which owns YouTube, after free speech advocates urged the court to overturn a 2-1 decision by three of its judges. The three judges had ordered YouTube to take down the video.
(Excerpt) Read more at alaskahighwaynews.ca ...
Who cares at this point, unless that film director needs this done so that he can sue for slander. They’ve already ruined his professional life for the time being.
If this film director survives the Obama Admin. he’ll have some interesting stories to write, and tell through film.
...does that mean the video can be re-posted.....accompanied by appropriate cartoon contest.
It wasn’t rioting and it wasn’t caused by a video. Other than that, this headline is spot on.
Carrying on Hillary’s big fat lie forward, even after it was exposed as a lie (the youtube video caused the murder of our Ambassador), is a big deal. They are lying in a court of law now.
"It wasn’t rioting and it wasn’t caused by a video."
Wow, the GOPe and the leftards really want Hillary on top.
The thought makes me puke.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.