Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrifying 1906 Illustrations of H. G. Wells’ ‘The War of the Worlds’
Flavorwire ^ | April 26, 2015 | Alison Nastasi

Posted on 05/14/2015 12:00:11 PM PDT by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: tet68

Yeah, that’s what I was thinking of. That kind of art has inspired all sorts of modern “erotica” based on it in Japan, but the early stuff dates to the 19th century, so an artist in 1906 might have been familiar with it.

I was thinking of posting an image from wikipedia of that famous woodcut to show the similarity, but even though it’s “art”, the mods would probably frown on the graphic nature...


21 posted on 05/14/2015 6:11:02 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Something to keep in mind is that the impressionists
were influenced by the japanese woodblock prints that
were sometimes used to wrap ceramics in for shipment
at the turn of the century and japanese prints appear
in many impressionist works.
So it is entirely possible he was aware of them.


22 posted on 05/14/2015 6:15:27 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

To me, the more modern takes on these kind of stories, even if well done, usually miss the mark. I think it’s because the stories themselves were suited to a certain era, so it might be better to see them in black and white, or grainy, than high definition with all the modern bells and whistles.

For example, take “King Kong”. Just the nature of that story, a giant ape coming to gleaming New York City and wrecking it, it’s not a “modern” story. It reflects the subconscious of it’s time, just like “Godzilla”’s radioactive monsters reflected the subconscious of Japan after a humiliating defeat and nuclear attacks. So, even though I like Jackson’s remake of Kong, it is missing something, despite being set in the same era, and having most of the shots intentionally duplicated. It’s a nostalgic piece now, but that wasn’t true for the original.


23 posted on 05/14/2015 6:21:56 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Jaws doesn’t really have many special effects. You hardly ever see the shark.


24 posted on 05/14/2015 8:26:54 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson