Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU

I’d go further and say that the story that Harold was ever shipwrecked was completely made up b******t, just part of the supporting myth used to rationalize William the Usurper’s conquest and rule.


36 posted on 05/10/2015 7:09:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Would not surprise me.


38 posted on 05/11/2015 4:44:51 AM PDT by ZULU (Boehner and McConnell are Obama's Strumpets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv; ZULU
That theory that one or more shipwrecks played any role in Harold's defeat at Hastings seems dubious. Harold had to first defeat a Danish invasion at Stamford bridge, then force-march his men to Hastings. Harolds troops were exhausted and were too late to stop the Normans from embarking and forming up their troops. A battle to prevent the Normans from even setting foot on English soil would have worked (probably) if Harold was waiting for them with a well-rested army.
43 posted on 05/13/2015 9:25:14 PM PDT by ARepublicanForAllReasons (New tagline to be unveiled soon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson