Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: catnipman
This is the real reason Microsoft refuses to secure their operating systems, because it’s not really that difficult for them to do that, namely quit making all login ids superuser by default and forbidding the execution of software that hasn’t been installed by a superuser into a secured location, and perhaps setting and enforcing security (and crapware avoidance) standards for major software vendors.

Apparently whoever came up with Device Guard didn't get that memo.

19 posted on 05/07/2015 9:55:50 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

“Apparently whoever came up with Device Guard didn’t get that memo.”

Device Guard is just another bag on the side. It’s not real security: real security is built-in right from the start.


27 posted on 05/07/2015 10:19:57 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson