Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cementjungle
I had three employers over my career, and I did indeed keep my 401K's together... simpler to manage that way.

I've always looked at it as "1. 401(k) investments are generally worse, higher cost and fewer choices than I could get on my own at a low cost broker (Vanguard, Fidelity, Schwab, etc.). 2. I would rather have control of my money rather than let someone else control it, especially if things start going bad at my current job." As soon as I leave, the money gets rolled over into my personal account. The only thing I lose is the ability to borrow against my 401(k), but I have never been tempted to do that and my last job didn't allow it anyway.

25 posted on 04/25/2015 8:55:14 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Darth Obama on 529 plans: I am altering the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

My employers all set up our 401K’s in our own names (but less control until fully vested). Vanguard for the first ones, then Fidelity... I was able to move the Vanguard ones into my Fidelity account. Still 401K with the Federal rules... but I was always allowed to make the investment choices.... I thought that’s how it worked for all of them.... perhaps that was just my case.


34 posted on 04/25/2015 10:00:57 AM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson