There's a pattern?
Kid snitched out by gruberment drones for exercising free speech.
The Hartes snitched out by gruberment drones "watching" a hydroponics store.
Wichita decides to do something to eliminate excess snitching, and the head Kansas gruberment law drone tries to put the kibosh on this exercise of voting rights.
The kid is the one who snitched on his mom since you seem obsessed with the term.
He is the one who opened his mouth in the first place.
His mom was using a substance that is currently illegal in Kansas...should childrens services simply have ignored that fact?
Would you be saying the same thing if his mom was using crack around him?
of course not.
(not comparing crack to pot I'm pointing out that both are illegal in Kansas)
"The Hartes snitched out by gruberment drones "watching" a hydroponics store."
Nope...a state trooper observed them leaving the store and an investigation was started based on the false assumtion they were growing pot...which again...is currently illegal in Kansas.
They also have a 7 million dollar lawsuit going over the raid...which I hope they win.
"Wichita decides to do something to eliminate excess snitching, and the head Kansas gruberment law drone tries to put the kibosh on this exercise of voting rights."
State law trumps city law....which as a Gun owner...I can say is a good thing...otherwise there would be a mine field of patchwork anti gun laws in my state that I could run afoul of without even knowing just by driving through a small town with my hand gun in my shoulder rig.
If you want the State law changed...then work to change it...bitching about it...or using false premis's to make an argument doesnt mean anything.