Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BradyLS

I’m also reminded that Apollo 11’s Lunar Module had information overload errors and couldn’t keep up with the stream of information the landing radar was feeding it. Maybe something of the sort is happening with the Space X vehicle, too, and the guidance systems can’t stick the landing.


7 posted on 04/18/2015 3:34:03 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BradyLS

I think there is some similarity in that the Falcon stage is very unstable, not designed to land, and has limited ability to maneuver. The software probably has considerable constraints as to what it can do considering the above factors.

They want to avoid getting into a situation like what’s described here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilot-induced_oscillation


16 posted on 04/18/2015 3:45:03 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS
1201 and 1202 alarms. Don't ask me how I know. I had a mis-spent youth, and have all those raw videos.

/johnny

46 posted on 04/18/2015 5:03:59 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: BradyLS

Processors are literally a million times faster today than what was available for Apollo’s day.
.


48 posted on 04/18/2015 5:13:15 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson