Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MichaelCorleone
I believe it was Judge Scalia who remarked: “The Constitution is an enduring document, not a living one”.

He also gave full-throated endorsement to Wickard and then some in Raich =>

Where necessary to make a regulation of interstate commerce effective, Congress may regulate even those intrastate activities that do not themselves substantially affect interstate commerce.

Scalia the Elastic, concurring in Raich

8 posted on 04/18/2015 11:26:18 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H

Scalia: “Where necessary to make a regulation of interstate commerce effective, Congress may regulate even those intrastate activities that do not themselves substantially affect interstate commerce.”

I can’t wrap my mind around how wrong that statement is specifically from Scalia. I can understand the perspective, the reasoning, but it goes against the Constitution as I understand it.

Such confusion is a reason I wish the wording could be changed from “regulate interstate” commerce to adjudicating interstate commerce. Eliminate the Fed as regulators, or we continue on with the mess we have.


11 posted on 04/18/2015 1:18:04 PM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson