Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: drbuzzard

The U.S. would have been better off adopting the German MG-3; basically the MG-42 in .308 NATO.


32 posted on 04/07/2015 7:15:54 AM PDT by catman67 (14 gauge?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: catman67

The MG 34 had more machined parts and was more expensive and time consuming to build compared to the MG 42 which used a lot of stamped parts.
Like the Luger P-08 compared to the Walther P-38.
I recall reading the MG-42 compared to the M-60 “Pig”.
Or vice versa.
GIs described its rate of fire like “tearing a sheet of linoleum” and had about the same respect for it that Germans had for our Browning fifty caliber.


35 posted on 04/07/2015 8:39:25 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson