1) Significantly warmer temperatures on a global scale that are verifiable. (So far that is not the case.) 2) The temperatures need to be elevated for 30-years without stops and starts. 3) Those exact temperature increases need to be accurately predicted by a computer model that does not get changed to meet the new data. 4) There must be a scientifically valid and repeatable scientific experimental model that ties in man’s activities with the increased temperature. Get those things and I will move significantly from my skepticism. Oldplayer Occam's Razor - Solar Scientists have been extremely accurate in predicting the behaviour of the sun and the fact that we are approaching a minimum. They predict global temperatures will fall as solar activity decreases. They have been correct to this point and theirs is the simplest explanation of climate behaviour over the past 20 years.
The brilliant and sinister campaign on behalf of Anthropogenic Global Warming has been astoundingly successful in the face of contrary scientific evidence. In fact, it is now established international governmental policy.
The Maunder Minimum, The Milankovitch Glaciation Cycle, even Volcanic Activity, mean absolutely nothing to the lucrative Warming Industry. The verifiable data mean even less to politicians, the MSM, and the public. Why should data matter? It doesn't at the UN.
Santa Claus must exist. Someone beyond the knowing of Reason has to be dropping the cash bundles on the Warmists.